A Review on Meta-Heuristic and Reinforcement Learning for VLSI Floor Planning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6919/ICJE.202506_11(6).0050Keywords:
VLSI Floor Planning; Meta-Heuristic Algorithms; Deep Reinforcement Learning.Abstract
Floor planning is a foundational step in the physical design of very-large-scale integration (VLSI) circuits, directly influencing chip area utilization, interconnect length, and overall performance. Owing to the NP-hard nature of both two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) floor planning problems, exact optimization methods become computationally prohibitive as design complexity increases. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of two major solution paradigms: classical meta-heuristic algorithms and modern reinforcement learning techniques. We first review widely adopted meta-heuristics-including simulated annealing, genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimization, and ant colony optimization-highlighting their operational principles, strengths in global search, and practical challenges related to parameter tuning and convergence. Next, we explore reinforcement learning frameworks that cast floor planning as a sequential decision-making task, with deep reinforcement learning agents capable of learning placement policies in high-dimensional spaces. Comparative analysis reveals that while meta-heuristics excel in adaptability and ease of implementation, reinforcement learning offers potential for automated, data-driven optimization with reduced manual intervention. Finally, we discuss emerging hybrid approaches that integrate meta-heuristic exploration with learned policy refinement, pointing toward future research directions aimed at achieving efficient, high-quality layouts for next-generation VLSI designs.
Downloads
References
[1] Nayak P. A study of technology roadmap for application-specific integrated circuit[D]. Rice University, 2021.
[2] Shalf J. The future of computing beyond Moore’s Law[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 2020, 378(2166): 20190061.
[3] Leiserson C E, Thompson N C, Emer J S, et al. There’s plenty of room at the Top: What will drive computer performance after Moore’s law?[J]. Science, 2020, 368(6495): eaam9744.
[4] Burg D, Ausubel J H. Moore’s Law revisited through Intel chip density[J]. PloS one, 2021, 16(8): e0256245.
[5] Ding B, Zhang Z H, Gong L, et al. A novel thermal management scheme for 3D-IC chips with multi-cores and high power density[J]. Applied thermal engineering, 2020, 168: 114832.
[6] Huang C Y, Dewey G, Mannebach E, et al. 3-D self-aligned stacked NMOS-on-PMOS nanoribbon transistors for continued Moore’s law scaling[C]//2020 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM). IEEE, 2020: 20.6. 1-20.6. 4.
[7] Kang K, Benini L, De Micheli G. Cost-effective design of mesh-of-tree interconnect for multicore clusters with 3-D stacked L2 scratchpad memory[J]. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 2014, 23(9): 1828-1841.
[8] Ben Abdallah A, Ben Abdallah A. 3D integration technology for multicore systems on-chip[J]. Advanced Multicore Systems-On-Chip: Architecture, On-Chip Network, Design, 2017: 175-199.
[9] Hu X, Stow D, Xie Y. Die stacking is happening[J]. IEEE micro, 2018, 38(1): 22-28.
[10] Ghaderi Z, Alqahtani A, Bagherzadeh N. AROMa: aging-aware deadlock-free adaptive routing algorithm and online monitoring in 3D NoCs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2017, 29(4): 772-788.
[11] J. Cong, C. Liu, and G. Luo, “Quantitative studies of impact of 3D IC design on repeater usage,” in Proc. Int. VLSI/ULSI Multilevel Interconnection Conf., 2008, pp. 344–348.
[12] Kim D H, Athikulwongse K, Healy M B, et al. Design and analysis of 3D-MAPS (3D massively parallel processor with stacked memory)[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2013, 64(1): 112 125.
[13] Talbi E G. Metaheuristics: From Design to Implementation[M]. John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
[14] Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D, et al. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning[J]. Nature, 2015, 518(7540): 529–533.
[15] Cong J, Huang Y, Yuan B, et al. A topology-driven floorplanner with preplaced modules and soft blocks for 3D ICs[J]. ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES), 2011, 16(4): 1–20.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Core Journal of Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.