Study on Hydraulic Performance of Modular Constructed Wetlands based on Baffle Optimization

Authors

  • Rong Hao
  • Zhonggou Chen
  • Guoyi Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6919/ICJE.202605_12(5).0023

Keywords:

Modular Constructed Wetlands; Numerical Simulation; Flow Field Distribution; Hydraulic Characteristics; Structural Optimization Design.

Abstract

This study addresses the severe clogging, challenging construction quality control, and high maintenance costs associated with traditional constructed wetlands by exploring structural optimization approaches for modular constructed wetlands (MCW). To gain an intuitive understanding of the internal flow patterns within modular constructed wetlands, a three-dimensional CFD simplified porous medium model was developed using FLUENT software. To further optimize the hydraulic efficiency of the modular wetland system, the impact of baffle arrangement on overall hydraulic performance was systematically investigated. Nine baffle configuration modes were compared in simulations, revealing that a configuration with two inner baffles represented the optimal solution: it achieved a flow field uniformity index of 0.68, an effective volume ratio of 0.815, a hydraulic efficiency of 0.792, and a fluid dispersion coefficient of merely 0.028. Increasing the number of baffles or concentrating them inward significantly degraded the flow field, resulting in a hydraulic efficiency of only 0.441 for a configuration with four inner baffles. This study validates the effectiveness of CFD-based structural parameter optimization, providing a quantitative theoretical foundation and practical technical solutions for efficient, standardized design of modular constructed wetlands.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] United Nations Children's Fund, World Health Organization. Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000-2022: special focus on gender[M]. World Health Organization, 2024.

[2] Schwarzenbach R P, Egli T, Hofstetter T B, et al. Global water pollution and human health[J]. Annual review of environment and resources, 2010, 35: 109-136.

[3] Fletcher T D, Shuster W, Hunt W F, et al. SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more–The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage[J]. Urban water journal, 2015, 12(7): 525-542.

[4] Suhaib K H, Bhunia P. Dynamics of clogging in subsurface flow constructed wetlands[J]. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, 2022, 26(1): 03121004.

[5] Vymazal J. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: five decades of experience[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2011, 45(1): 61-69.

[6] Fang Y, Kong L, Zhang P, et al. Fifteen-year analysis of constructed wetland clogging: A critical review[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 365: 132755.

[7] Zhong H, Jiang C, He X, et al. Simultaneous change of microworld and biofilm formation in constructed wetlands filled with biochar[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 349: 119583.

[8] Li Y, Peng L, Li H, et al. Clogging in subsurface wastewater infiltration beds: genesis, influencing factors, identification methods and remediation strategies[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2021, 83(10): 2309-2326.

[9] Rajabzadeh A R, Legge R L, Weber K P. Multiphysics modelling of flow dynamics, biofilm development and wastewater treatment in a subsurface vertical flow constructed wetland mesocosm[J]. Ecological engineering, 2015, 74: 107-116.

[10] Zhang Hui. Simulation study on indoor pollutant diffusion concentration fields based on multi-factor coupling [D]. Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2011.

[11] Yin Decai. Simulation study of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands based on CFD [D]. Hunan University, 2017.

[12] Anle, Li Qingman, Liang Jie, et al. Research and Application of CFD in Urban Wind and Heat Environment in China [J]. Journal of Aerodynamics, 2024,42(3):1-18.

[13] Li Lei, Hu Fei, Liu Jing. Application of CFD technology in mesoscale issues of urban climate and environment in China [J]. Progress in Meteorological Science and Technology, 2015,5(6):23-30.

[14] Zhang Xin, Yang Gang, Wang Zhiqiang, et al. Numerical simulation of turbulent flow in curved flue tubes based on CFD [J]. Industrial Furnace, 2023,45(1):6–11+15.

[15] Alexandros T, Steve M, John B. Computational fluid dynamics modelling of different detention pond configurations in the interest of sustainable flow regimes and gravity sedimentation potential[J]. Water and Environment Journal, 2015, 29(1): 129-139.

[16] Wang Bingjie, Li Hui, Yang Xiaoyong, et al. Application progress of CFD numerical simulation technology in studying the multiphase flow characteristics of droplet microfluidics [J]. Chemical Industry Progress, 2021,40(4):1715.

[17] Klaywittaphat P ,Promping J ,Chatthong B .Optimizing variable Geometry of SMBI nozzle for Thailand Tokamak 1 (TT-1) using CFD with Ansys (Fluent)[J].Fusion Engineering and Design,2026,223115556-115556.

[18] Patil M ,Sidramappa A ,Hebbale M A , et al.Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of air-cooled solar photovoltaic (PV/T) panels[J].Materials Today: Proceedings,2024,10093-101.

[19] Banik A ,Bandyopadhyay K T ,Biswal K S .Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Simulation of Cross-flow Mode Operation of Membrane for Downstream Processing[J].Recent Patents on Biotechnology,2019, 13(1):57-68.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hao, R., Chen, Z., & Zhang, G. (2026). Study on Hydraulic Performance of Modular Constructed Wetlands based on Baffle Optimization. International Core Journal of Engineering, 12(5), 210-222. https://doi.org/10.6919/ICJE.202605_12(5).0023