Prediction of Bottom-hole Pressure in Deep Wells Considering Temperature-pressure Coupling Effects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6919/ICJE.202609_12(9).0027Keywords:
Deep Well; Bottom Hole Pressure; High-temperature and High-pressure Conditions; Temperature-pressure Coupling; Drilling Fluid Rheology; Iterative Calculation.Abstract
Reliable bottom‑hole pressure (BHP) prediction is essential to guarantee operational safety during deep and ultra‑deep well drilling. Substantial shifts in drilling‑fluid physical properties under high‑temperature and high‑pressure (HTHP) conditions greatly modify pressure‑propagation behaviours inside the wellbore. Conventional prediction approaches commonly treat drilling‑fluid properties as fixed constants, which leads to degraded calculation precision when wellbore temperature and pressure experience sharp variations. To tackle this practical limitation, this work constructs a thermo‑pressure coupled BHP prediction model that accounts for temperature‑sensitive fluid compressibility and rheological parameters. A PVT equation of state is adopted to capture temperature‑dependent density variations of drilling fluids, while a modified Arrhenius model describes how rheological characteristics respond to temperature fluctuations. A segment‑by‑segment iterative algorithm is deployed to solve the coupled system consisting of fluid‑property correlations, wellbore temperature‑field equations and pressure‑gradient equations, yielding the full wellbore pressure distribution. Field data obtained from a 4583‑m multi‑string cased gas well was employed for model validation. Comparative analyses covering static hydrostatic pressure and circulating‑pressure scenarios reveal relative errors ranging from 1.26% to 2.03% against field measurements. Capable of reflecting how thermally induced fluid‑property shifts reshape wellbore pressure development, the proposed model fits well with HTHP well pressure‑prediction demands. It offers a practical analytical tool for deep‑well pressure evaluation and pressure management amid complex drilling scenarios.
Downloads
References
[1] Zamora, M., Roy, S., et al. (2013). Study on the volumetric behavior of base oils, brines, and drilling fluids under extreme temperatures and pressures. SPE Drilling & Completion, 28(3), 278–288.
[2] Demirdal, B., Cunha, J. C., Miska, S., & Takach, N. (2009). Importance of drilling fluids' rheological and volumetric characterization to plan and optimize managed pressure drilling operations. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 48(2), 8–14.
[3] Aftab, A., Ismail, A. R., Ibupoto, Z. H., et al. (2017). Nanoparticles based drilling muds a solution to drill elevated temperature wells: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 1301–1313.
[4] Song, X., & Guan, Z. (2012). Coupled modeling circulating temperature and pressure of gas–liquid two phase flow in deep water wells. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 92–93, 124–131.
[5] Zhang, R., Li, J., Liu, G., Yang, H., & Jiang, H. (2019). Analysis of coupled wellbore temperature and pressure calculation model and influence factors under multi-pressure system in deep-water drilling. Energies, 12(18), 3533.
[6] Chen, X., He, M., Xu, M., & Zhou, C. (2023). Fully transient coupled prediction model of wellbore temperature and pressure for multi-phase flow during underbalanced drilling. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 223, 211540.
[7] Fikeni, M., et al. (2022). Effect of temperature variation on the accurate prediction of bottom-hole pressure in well drilling. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 46(1), 12575–12595.
[8] He, M., Shi, H., & Xu, M. (2021). High-temperature and high-pressure rheological behavior of water-based drilling fluids. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 38(3), 271–279.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Core Journal of Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




