Blend-Ratio-Dependent Tensile Tradeoffs in Sodium-Periodate-Treated High-Amylose Starch/Poly(vinyl alcohol) Films

Authors

  • Yuntian Bi Beijing National Day School, Beijing, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6919/ICJE.202609_12(9).0017

Keywords:

Sodium Periodate; High-amylose Starch; Poly(Vinyl Alcohol); Solution Casting; Tensile Strength; Elongation at Break; Technical Replication.

Abstract

High-amylose starch/poly(vinyl alcohol) (HAMS/PVA) blends are attractive as renewable-content film materials, but their tensile response depends strongly on starch chemistry, blend ratio, processing, and moisture history. This study compared sodium-periodate-treated HAMS/PVA mass ratios of 1:1 (S1P1), 1:2 (S1P2), and 2:1 (S2P1) with an untreated HAMS/PVA 1:2 control (H1P2) and neat PVA. A 4% (w/v) HAMS dispersion was treated with 4.8 g sodium periodate per 4.0 g starch at 34 °C for 1 h under light-shielded conditions and dialyzed for 72 h. No plasticizer, acid catalyst, filler, or other processing aid was added. Films were solution-cast and tested as 10 mm wide strips at an initial grip separation of 100 mm and a crosshead speed of 10 mm min⁻¹. Using the confirmed centimeter-scale thickness records converted to millimeters, nominal tensile strength and crosshead-derived elongation at break were recalculated from the machine reports. H1P2 had the highest descriptive strength (5.82 ± 0.92 MPa) but fractured at 2.77 ± 0.21% elongation. At the same 1:2 ratio, periodate treatment reduced strength to 1.51 ± 0.09 MPa while increasing elongation to 27.37 ± 6.71%. Increasing the treated-starch fraction to 2:1 raised strength to 4.24 ± 0.73 MPa, 14.0% above neat PVA (3.72 ± 0.09 MPa), but its elongation remained much lower at 18.12 ± 12.57% compared with 128.24 ± 13.89% for PVA. The data therefore identify a composition-dependent tradeoff between strength and extensibility rather than a universal optimum. Periodate cleavage can introduce aldehyde-type functionality and may alter hydrogen bonding, chain packing, and aldehyde-hydroxyl reactions, but covalent crosslinking was not directly measured. The results support further mechanistic and packaging-performance testing of treated HAMS/PVA blends. They do not establish food-contact suitability, barrier performance, or biodegradability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Lauer, M. K., & Smith, R. C. (2020). Recent advances in starch-based films toward food packaging applications: Physicochemical, mechanical, and functional properties. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 19, 3031–3083. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12627

[2] Bangar, S. P., Purewal, S. S., Trif, M., Maqsood, S., Kumar, M., Manjunatha, V., & Rusu, A. V. (2021). Functionality and applicability of starch-based films: An eco-friendly approach. Foods, 10(9), 2181. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10092181

[3] Jayarathna, S., Andersson, M., & Andersson, R. (2022). Recent advances in starch-based blends and composites for bioplastics applications. Polymers, 14(21), 4557. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214557

[4] Lin, Y., Zhu, P., Yan, F., & Chen, S. (2024). Development of modified starch-based biodegradable plastics packaging. Plastics, 53(6), 113–120. (In Chinese)

[5] Li, X. F., Wang, F., Guo, P. F., & Du, L. Y. (2023). Research progress on starch-based degradable plastics. Guangzhou Chemical Industry, 51(18), 13–16. (In Chinese)

[6] Vieira, E. F., Amaral, T., Domingues, V. F., & Delerue-Matos, C. (2026). Hydrophobicity strategies of starch-based films: Recent advances and perspectives. Polymers, 18(4), 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18040490

[7] Wu, Y., Tang, R., Guo, A., Tao, X., Hu, Y., Sheng, X., Qu, P., Wang, S., Li, J., & Li, F. (2023). Enhancing starch-based packaging materials: Optimization of plasticizers and process parameters. Materials, 16(17), 5953. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16175953

[8] Gómez-Aldapa, C. A., Velazquez, G., Gutierrez, M. C., Rangel-Vargas, E., Castro-Rosas, J., & Aguirre-Loredo, R. Y. (2020). Effect of polyvinyl alcohol on the physicochemical properties of biodegradable starch films. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 239, 122027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122027

[9] Cano, A. I., Cháfer, M., Chiralt, A., & González-Martínez, C. (2015). Physical and microstructural properties of biodegradable films based on pea starch and PVA. Journal of Food Engineering, 167, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.06.003

[10] Abramowska, A., Cieśla, K. A., Buczkowski, M. J., Nowicki, A., & Głuszewski, W. (2015). The influence of ionizing radiation on the properties of starch-PVA films. Nukleonika, 60(3), 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1515/nuka-2015-0088

[11] Popescu, M. C., Dogaru, B. I., Goanta, M., & Timpu, D. (2018). Structural and morphological evaluation of CNC reinforced PVA/starch biodegradable films. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 116, 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.036

[12] Ray, D., Roy, P., Sengupta, S., Sengupta, S. P., Mohanty, A. K., & Misra, M. (2009). A study of dynamic mechanical and thermal behavior of starch/poly(vinyl alcohol) based films. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 17, 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-009-0116-0

[13] Yao, Y., Hsu, Y. I., & Uyama, H. (2024). Enhanced physical properties and water resistance of films using modified starch blend with poly(vinyl alcohol). Industrial Crops and Products, 222, 119870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119870

[14] Yang, Y., Liu, C., Chang, P. R., Chen, Y., Anderson, D. P., & Stumborg, M. (2010). Properties and structural characterization of oxidized starch/PVA/alpha-zirconium phosphate composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 115, 1089–1097. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.31099

[15] Jia, Y., Asoh, T. A., Hsu, Y. I., & Uyama, H. (2020). Wet strength improvement of starch-based blend films by formation of acetal/hemiacetal bonding. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 177, 109197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.109197

[16] Jain, N., Singh, V. K., & Chauhan, S. (2017). A review on mechanical and water absorption properties of polyvinyl alcohol based composites/films. Journal of Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 26(5–6), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2017-0027

[17] Garavand, Y., Taheri-Garavand, A., Garavand, F., Shahbazi, F, Khodaei, D., & Cacciotti, I. (2022). Starch-polyvinyl alcohol-based films reinforced with chitosan nanoparticles: Physical, mechanical, structural, thermal and antimicrobial properties. Applied Sciences, 12(3), 1111. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031111

[18] Dong, M., Mastroianni, G., Bilotti, E., Zhang, H., & Papageorgiou, D. G. (2024). Biodegradable starch-based nanocomposite films with exceptional water and oxygen barrier properties. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 12, 11056–11066. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c04198

[19] Muñoz-Gimena, P. F., Aragón-Gutiérrez, A., Blázquez-Blázquez, E., Arrieta, M. P., Rodríguez, G., Peponi, L., & López, D. (2024). Avocado seed starch-based films reinforced with starch nanocrystals. Polymers, 16(20), 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16202868

[20] Ma, H., Qin, W., Guo, B., & Li, P. (2022). Thermoplastic starch-based biodegradable plastics reinforced by carboxylated surface modification of nano silica. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 39(7), 3478–3484. https://doi.org/10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20210817.002. (In Chinese)

[21] Kliem, S., Kreutzbruck, M., & Bonten, C. (2020). Review on the biological degradation of polymers in various environments. Materials, 13(20), 4586. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13204586

[22] Wicaksono, J. A., Purwadaria, T., Yulandi, A., & Tan, W. A. (2022). Bacterial dynamics during the burial of starch-based bioplastic and oxo-low-density-polyethylene in compost soil. BMC Microbiology, 22, 309. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02729-1

[23] Jia, Y., Hsu, Y. I., & Uyama, H. (2023). A starch-based, crosslinked blend film with seawater-specific dissolution characteristics. Carbohydrate Polymers, 299, 120181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120181

[24] Soni, R., Hsu, Y. I., Asoh, T. A., & Uyama, H. (2022). Cellulose nanofiber reinforced starch film with rapid disintegration in marine environments. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 139(32), e52776. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.52776

[25] Rahman Khan, M. M., Rumon, M. M. H., & Islam, M. (2024). Synthesis, rheology, morphology, and mechanical properties of biodegradable PVA-based composite films: A review on recent progress. Processes, 12(12), 2880. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12122880

[26] Guan, Q., & Yan, H. (2024). Methods for identifying material properties of modified starch-based biodegradable plastics. Chemical Engineering & Equipment, (8), 126–129. https://doi.org/10.19566/j.cnki.cn35-1285/tq.2024.08.008. (In Chinese)

[27] ASTM International. (2021). ASTM D882-21: Standard test method for tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.

[28] Sharpe, W. N., Jr., Yuan, B., & Edwards, R. L. (1997). A new technique for measuring the mechanical properties of thin films. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 6(3), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1109/84.623109

[29] Nix, W. D. (1989). Mechanical properties of thin films. Metallurgical Transactions A, 20, 2217–2245. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02666659

Downloads

Published

2026-10-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Bi, Y. (2026). Blend-Ratio-Dependent Tensile Tradeoffs in Sodium-Periodate-Treated High-Amylose Starch/Poly(vinyl alcohol) Films. International Core Journal of Engineering, 12(9), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.6919/ICJE.202609_12(9).0017