Numerical Analysis on Seismic Response of Buried Pipelines with Defects in Liquefiable Sites
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6919/ICJE.202608_12(8).0012Keywords:
Buried Defective Pipeline; Liquefiable Site; Seismic Excitation; Numerical Analysis.Abstract
The rapid expansion of long-distance oil and gas pipeline networks has led to increased pipeline crossings of high-seismic-risk regions. Soil liquefaction substantially degrades pipe–soil interaction restraint, triggering significant axial deformation of buried pipelines. In addition, local corrosion defects generated during long-term service reduce pipe wall cross-sectional area and induce severe stress concentration, considerably exacerbating pipeline failure hazards under seismic conditions.In this study, a finite element numerical model is established to investigate the seismic response of buried pressure pipelines with local corrosion defects in liquefiable soils. Solid elements are employed to discretize the pipeline structure, while nonlinear spring elements are adopted to characterize soil confinement effects. The stiffness degradation of soil in liquefied zones is realized by reducing the stiffness of soil springs, which accurately simulates the attenuation of soil bearing capacity during liquefaction. The maximum axial strain is selected as the critical evaluation index to quantify the tensile and compressive deformation of pipelines during liquefaction-induced uplift. By comparing the calculated axial strain with the material yield strain, the plastic development degree and bearing capacity degradation of defective pipelines can be quantitatively identified. Parametric analyses are systematically conducted to explore the effects of liquefied zone length, corrosion defect depth, and internal operating pressure on pipeline axial strain responses.The numerical results demonstrate that the expansion of the liquefied zone weakens pipe–soil constraint stiffness and enlarges pipeline axial deformation, with the maximum axial strain increasing monotonically with liquefied zone length. Deepened corrosion defects significantly reduce the local structural stiffness of the pipe wall and aggravate strain concentration at defect locations. Moreover, elevated internal pressure raises the initial circumferential stress of pipelines, which further amplifies the axial strain of defective sections under seismic excitation. This study provides a reliable theoretical reference for the seismic safety assessment and risk mitigation of defective buried pipelines in liquefaction-prone areas.
Downloads
References
[1] Wang, Y. X., Yi, X. Z., He, Y. X., et al. (2025). Residual strength prediction of X80 oil and gas pipelines with complex corrosion defects. Petroleum Machinery, 53(8), 116–124. (In Chinese)
[2] Pu, F., Yang, Y. B., & Fan, X. (2026). Failure pressure evaluation of pipelines under interaction of multiple corrosion defects. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 1–19. (In Chinese)
[3] Liu, C. G., & Ke, G. M. (2010). Numerical simulation analysis of buried pipelines in liquefied zones. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 30(4), 156–162. (In Chinese)
[4] Cao, X. D. (2025). Seismic response analysis of buried continuous steel pipelines in liquefiable sites with different soil layer structures [Master’s thesis]. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration. (In Chinese)
[5] Li, D. Q., Shan, S. Z., Wang, S., & Du, W. Q. (2024). Uplift response and vulnerability analysis of buried pipelines in liquefied zones considering spatial variability of soil. Engineering Mechanics, 41(9), 31–41. (In Chinese)
[6] Yang, C. S. (2022). Theoretical analysis and finite element simulation of pipeline structures in liquefied soil layers [Master’s thesis]. Jinan University. (In Chinese)
[7] Xu, B., Chen, K. H., Wang, L. L., et al. (2024). Stochastic seismic response analysis and reliability evaluation of pipelines in liquefied soil. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 46(1), 81–89. (In Chinese)
[8] Chen, H. Y. (2024). Shaking table tests and influencing factor research on seismic response of buried pipelines [Master’s thesis]. Guangzhou University. (In Chinese)
[9] Wu, Y., Li, D., & Chen, L. (2023). Seismic response research of buried X80 pipelines with corrosion defects at large elevation differences. Petroleum Machinery, 51(4), 144–154. (In Chinese)
[10] Mao, R., Zhan, S. D., & Zhang, J. (2025). Stress analysis of X80 pipelines with inner and outer wall corrosion defects. Journal of Beibu Gulf University, 40(2), 57–64. (In Chinese)
[11] Yu, L., & Kong, L. Z. (2025). Simulation and prediction of ultimate load of X80 oil and gas pipelines with corrosion defects. Mechanics in Engineering, 47(2), 323–330. (In Chinese)
[12] Liu, Q., Zhang, M., & Zhang, Q. (2023). Influence analysis of corrosion defect parameters on ultimate bearing capacity of pipelines. Chemical Safety and Environment, 36(9), 40–44. (In Chinese)
[13] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. (2015). Code for Design of Gas Transmission Pipeline Engineering (GB 50251-2015). China Planning Press. (In Chinese)
[14] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. (2017). Technical Standard for Seismic Design of Oil and Gas Transmission Pipeline Routes (GB/T 50470-2017). China Planning Press. (In Chinese)
[15] Takada, S. (1988). Earthquake Resistance of Buried Pipelines. Academic Books and Periodicals Press. (In Chinese and English)
[16] Bing, Q. Y. (2018). Mechanical response research of buried liquid transport pipelines under site liquefaction [Master’s thesis]. North China University of Science and Technology. (In Chinese)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Core Journal of Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




