Autonomous Wingtip Docking of Fixed-Wing UAVs: Relative Navigation, Closed-Loop Control, and System-Level Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6919/ICJE.202608_12(8).0007Keywords:
Fixed-wing UAV; Wingtip Docking; Relative Navigation; Visual–inertial Fusion; Visual Servoing.Abstract
Autonomous wingtip docking of fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles offers a potential approach to long-endurance flight, modular mission reconfiguration, and airborne assembly. Unlike conventional formation flight, this task requires two forward-flying aircraft to reduce the relative position, attitude, and closing-velocity errors between their actual docking points while satisfying fixed-wing flight-envelope, visibility, aerodynamic-interaction, and collision-avoidance constraints. This article organizes relevant research around two closely coupled themes: relative navigation and closed-loop docking control. Vision-based relative measurement methods are examined, including cooperative fiducial markers, structure-based non-cooperative perception, monocular and stereo pose estimation, and learning–geometry hybrid approaches; multi-sensor relative-state estimation is then discussed with emphasis on visual–inertial fusion, GNSS/RTK and UWB assistance, dual-moving-platform modeling, asynchronous measurements, lever-arm compensation, observability, and uncertainty representation. The control literature is further analyzed from the perspectives of position-based and image-based visual servoing, robust and prescribed-performance control, model predictive and safety-critical control, and learning-based disturbance compensation. The central technical challenge lies not in improving pose-estimation accuracy or tracking convergence in isolation, but in constructing an uncertainty-aware, constraint-compliant, and contact-transition-capable autonomous closed-loop system. Future research should therefore focus on dual-platform relative observability, confidence-aware closure control, visibility-preserving trajectory planning, real-time near-field aerodynamic modeling, hybrid contact dynamics, navigation–control–mechanism co-design, and progressively structured experimental validation.
Downloads
References
[1] Parry, J., & Hubbard, S. (2023). Review of sensor technology to support automated air-to-air refueling of a probe configured uncrewed aircraft. Sensors, 23(2), 995.
[2] Ren, J., & Quan, Q. (2024). Progress in modeling and control of probe-and-drogue autonomous aerial refueling. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 37(5), 6–26.
[3] Meng, Y., An, C., Xie, C., et al. (2022). Conceptual design and flight test of two wingtip-docked multi-body aircraft. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 35(12), 144–155.
[4] Zhou, W., Ma, P., Wei, B., et al. (2023). Experimental study on aerodynamic characteristics of fixed-wing UAV air docking. Aerospace Science and Technology, 137, 108257.
[5] Huo, J., Liu, H., Huang, R., et al. (2026). Autonomous aerial docking for compound VTOL UAVs with thrust vectoring rotors. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 244, 113782.
[6] Causa, F., Opromolla, R., & Fasano, G. (2022). Closed loop integration of air-to-air visual measurements for cooperative UAV navigation in GNSS challenging environments. Aerospace Science and Technology, 130, 107947.
[7] Yang, K., Bai, C., She, Z., et al. (2025). High-speed interception multicopter control by image-based visual servoing. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 33(1), 119–135.
[8] Guo, H., Song, T., Ye, J., et al. (2026). Image-based visual servoing tracking control of a quadrotor with target estimation and field of view constraints. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 104354.
[9] Zhao, W., Liu, H., & Wang, X. (2021). Robust visual servoing control for quadrotors landing on a moving target. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 358(4), 2301–2319.
[10] Wang, Y., Wang, H., Zhu, J., et al. (2025). Flexible prescribed performance-based approaching control for UAV aerial recovery under multiwind disturbances. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 38(4), 103282.
[11] Su, Z., Xing, Z., Li, X., et al. (2024). Constrained docking control for shipborne UAV SideArm recovery. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 37(5), 39–59.
[12] Wu, Z., Wang, L., Zhang, Z., et al. (2026). Practical predefined-time control for stable and safe docking of fixed-wing receiver in aerial refueling. Aerospace Science and Technology, 112451.
[13] Esfahani, H. N., & Mohammadpour Velni, J. (2024). Safe net-recovery of fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles using safety-critical MPC. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 58(28), 324–329.
[14] Xin, L., Tang, Z., Gai, W., et al. (2022). Vision-based autonomous landing for the UAV: A review. Aerospace, 9(11), 634.
[15] Semerikov, S. O., Nechypurenko, P. P., Vakaliuk, T. A., et al. (2025). Vision-based autonomous UAV landing: A comprehensive review of technologies, techniques, and applications. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 111, 115.
[16] Funke, A., Lück, V., & Glabeke, G. (2026). Robust control of an actively controlled drogue for autonomous aerial docking. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 17, 677–693.
[17] Liu, R., Huang, Y., Ren, J., et al. (2026). Probe-and-drogue autonomous aerial refueling with a velocity control mode: An image-based visual servo method. Aerospace Science and Technology, 176, 112007.
[18] Ren, J., Du, J., Xu, B., et al. (2026). Multi-degree-of-freedom reliable docking control for probe-and-drogue autonomous aerial refueling. Aerospace Science and Technology, 168, 111086.
[19] Lin, P., He, Y., & Chen, Y. (2024). Unmanned autonomous air-to-air refueling intelligent docking technology. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 37(5), 1–5.
[20] Wen, S., Gao, Y., Hu, B., et al. (2025). AARPose: Real-time and accurate drogue pose measurement based on monocular vision for autonomous aerial refueling. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 38(6), 103307.
[21] Gong, K., Liu, B., Xu, X., et al. (2023). Research of an unmanned aerial vehicle autonomous aerial refueling docking method based on binocular vision. Drones, 7(7), 433.
[22] Gao, Y., Yang, S., & Liu, X. (2023). Drogue position measurement of autonomous aerial refueling based on embedded system. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 353, 114251.
[23] Ma, Y., Zhao, R., Liu, E., et al. (2019). A novel autonomous aerial refueling drogue detection and pose estimation method based on monocular vision. Measurement, 136, 132–142.
[24] Sun, Y., Deng, Y., Duan, H., et al. (2019). Bionic visual close-range navigation control system for the docking stage of probe-and-drogue autonomous aerial refueling. Aerospace Science and Technology, 91, 136–149.
[25] Quan, Q., Liu, R., Liu, H., et al. (2025). Image-based visual servo docking control for autonomous aerial refueling. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 48(7), 1689–1698.
[26] Su, Z., Wang, H., Li, N., et al. (2018). Exact docking flight controller for autonomous aerial refueling with back-stepping based high order sliding mode. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 101, 338–360.
[27] Wu, J., Luo, H., & Ai, J. (2020). Docking controller for autonomous aerial refueling with adaptive dynamic surface control. IEEE Access, 8, 99846–99857.
[28] Su, Z., Liu, Y., & Wang, H. (2022). Probe dynamics direct control for aerial recovery with preassigned docking performance. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 58(4), 3509–3523.
[29] Liu, Y., Wang, H., Liu, B., et al. (2023). Learning-based compound docking control for UAV aerial recovery: Methodology and implementation. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 28(3), 1706–1717.
[30] Wang, Y., Wang, H., Liu, Y., et al. (2023). Performance-guaranteed neuroadaptive docking control for UAV aerial recovery under carrier maneuvering flight. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 59(6), 8355–8368.
[31] Su, Z., Li, C., Wu, J., et al. (2022). Neuro-adaptive prescribed performance control for aerial-recovery drogue with actuator constraints. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 45(8), 1451–1465.
[32] Liu, Y., Wang, H., & Fan, J. (2019). Novel docking controller for autonomous aerial refueling with probe direct control and learning-based preview method. Aerospace Science and Technology, 94, 105403.
[33] Liu, Y., Zhao, Z., Ma, H., et al. (2021). A stochastic approximation method for probability prediction of docking success for aerial refueling. Applied Soft Computing, 103, 107139.
[34] Hang, B., Guo, P., Yan, S., et al. (2025). Robust docking control and safety evaluation of autonomous aerial refueling for unmanned aerial vehicles. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 362(10), 107736.
[35] Hang, B., Guo, P. (2026). Precise docking and safety prediction for unmanned aerial vehicle autonomous aerial refueling: An adaptive control and deep learning approach. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 363(9), 108693.
[36] Zheng, T., Richardson, T. S., & Meier, K. (2026). Design of an autonomous airborne recovery system: A fixed-wing UAV-quadrotor platform using improved NMPC and vision-based control. Drones, 10(3), 212.
[37] Gryte, K., Sollie, M. L., & Johansen, T. A. (2021). Control system architecture for automatic recovery of fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles in a moving arrest system. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 103, 73.
[38] Wang, Y., Wang, H., Liu, B., et al. (2021). A visual navigation framework for the aerial recovery of UAVs. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 70, 5019713.
[39] Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Li, H., et al. (2024). Runway-free recovery methods for fixed-wing UAVs: A comprehensive review. Drones, 8(9), 463.
[40] Worth, D., Choate, J., Lynch, J., et al. (2024). Relative vectoring using dual object detection for autonomous aerial refueling. Neural Computing and Applications, 36, 10143–10163.
[41] Xu, X., Zhuge, S., Li, C., et al. (2023). A vision-only relative distance calculation method for multi-UAV systems. Aerospace Science and Technology, 142, 108665.
[42] Luo, H., Zhang, K., Su, Y., et al. (2022). Monocular vision pose determination-based large rigid-body docking method. Measurement, 204, 112049.
[43] Shen, K., Zhuang, Y., Chen, Y., et al. (2023). AeroNet: An efficient relative localization and object detection network for cooperative aerial-ground unmanned vehicles. Pattern Recognition Letters, 171, 28–37.
[44] Lepetit, V., Moreno-Noguer, F., & Fua, P. (2009). EPnP: An accurate O(n) solution to the PnP problem. International Journal of Computer Vision, 81(2), 155–166.
[45] Collins, T., & Bartoli, A. (2014). Infinitesimal plane-based pose estimation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 109(3), 252–286.
[46] Garrido-Jurado, S., Muñoz-Salinas, R., Madrid-Cuevas, F. J., et al. (2014). Automatic generation and detection of highly reliable fiducial markers under occlusion. Pattern Recognition, 47(6), 2280–2292.
[47] Berral-Soler, R., Muñoz-Salinas, R., Medina-Carnicer, R., et al. (2024). DeepArUco++: Improved detection of square fiducial markers in challenging lighting conditions. Image and Vision Computing, 152, 105313.
[48] Olson, E. (2011). AprilTag: A robust and flexible visual fiducial system. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 3400–3407). IEEE.
[49] Lee, B., & Sung, S. (2024). A study on dual quaternion based cooperative relative navigation of multiple UAVs with monocular vision-inertial integration. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 37(11), 335–354.
[50] Kayhani, N., Zhao, W., McCabe, B., et al. (2022). Tag-based visual-inertial localization of unmanned aerial vehicles in indoor construction environments using an on-manifold extended Kalman filter. Automation in Construction, 135, 104112.
[51] Xiong, C., Lu, W., Xiong, H., et al. (2024). Onboard cooperative relative positioning system for Micro-UAV swarm based on UWB/Vision/INS fusion through distributed graph optimization. Measurement, 234, 114897.
[52] Chang, Y., Cheng, Y., Manzoor, U., et al. (2023). A review of UAV autonomous navigation in GPS-denied environments. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 170, 104533.
[53] Phan, T. D., & Kim, G. W. (2025). Toward specialized learning-based approaches for visual odometry: A comprehensive survey. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 111, 44.
[54] Cheng, C., Li, X., Xie, L., et al. (2022). Autonomous dynamic docking of UAV based on UWB-vision in GPS-denied environment. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 359(7), 2788–2809.
[55] Lin, H. Y., & Zhan, J. R. (2023). GNSS-denied UAV indoor navigation with UWB incorporated visual inertial odometry. Measurement, 206, 112256.
[56] Li, J., Yang, G., Cai, Q., et al. (2022). Cooperative navigation for UAVs in GNSS-denied area based on optimized belief propagation. Measurement, 192, 110797.
[57] Xiong, J., Xiong, Z., Cheong, J. W., et al. (2020). Cooperative positioning for low-cost close formation flight based on relative estimation and belief propagation. Aerospace Science and Technology, 106, 106068.
[58] Wang, S., Zhan, X., Zhai, Y., et al. (2021). Performance estimation for Kalman filter based multi-agent cooperative navigation by employing graph theory. Aerospace Science and Technology, 112, 106628.
[59] Shen, J., Wang, S., & Zhan, X. (2022). Multi-UAV cluster-based cooperative navigation with fault detection and exclusion capability. Aerospace Science and Technology, 124, 107570.
[60] Campos, C., Elvira, R., Gómez Rodríguez, J. J., et al. (2021). ORB-SLAM3: An accurate open-source library for visual, visual-inertial, and multimap SLAM. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 37(6), 1874–1890.
[61] Qin, T., Li, P., & Shen, S. (2018). VINS-Mono: A robust and versatile monocular visual-inertial state estimator. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 34(4), 1004–1020.
[62] Geneva, P., Eckenhoff, K., Lee, W., et al. (2020). OpenVINS: A research platform for visual-inertial estimation. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 4666–4672). IEEE.
[63] Nitsche, M., Pessacg, F., & Civera, J. (2020). Visual-inertial teach and repeat. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 131, 103577.
[64] Eckenhoff, K., Geneva, P., & Huang, G. (2021). MIMC-VINS: A versatile and resilient multi-IMU multi-camera visual-inertial navigation system. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 37(5), 1360–1380.
[65] Rebello, J., Li, C., & Waslander, S. L. (2021). DC-VINS: Dynamic camera visual inertial navigation system with online calibration. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (pp. 2559–2568). IEEE.
[66] Tang, H., Zhang, T., Niu, X., et al. (2023). IC-GVINS: A robust, real-time, INS-centric GNSS-visual-inertial navigation system. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 8(1), 216–223.
[67] Tandale, M. D., Bowers, R., & Valasek, J. (2006). Trajectory tracking controller for vision-based probe and drogue autonomous aerial refueling. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 29(4), 846–857.
[68] Dai, X., Quan, Q., Ren, J., et al. (2018). Terminal iterative learning control for autonomous aerial refueling under aerodynamic disturbances. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 41(7), 1576–1583.
[69] Ma, P., Zhou, W., Han, S., et al. (2026). Rapid prediction of aerodynamic parameters changes for close-range wings based on feature parameter correction. Aerospace Science and Technology, 168, 110707.
[70] Li, F., Sheng, H., Xiang, Y., et al. (2026). Modular UAV autonomous aerial docking and control based on multi-sensor fusion. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 104073.
[71] Jin, X., Liu, H., Dong, G., et al. (2025). Contact dynamics modeling and control during the combination process of air-ground robots. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 38, 39.
[72] Šćurić, A., Krznar, N., Penđer, A., et al. (2025). Autonomous multirotor UAV docking and charging: A comprehensive review of systems, mechanisms, and emerging technologies. Symmetry, 17(11), 1988.
[73] Shen, T. J., & Chen, C. L. (2025). Model-in-the-loop design and flight test validation of flight control laws for a small fixed-wing UAV. Drones, 9(9), 624.
[74] Tahir, M. A., Mir, I., & Islam, T. U. (2023). Control algorithms, Kalman estimation and near actual simulation for UAVs: State of art perspective. Drones, 7(6), 339.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Core Journal of Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




