AQWA-Based Motion Response Analysis of a Suezmax FPSO

Authors

  • Junjie Li Naval Architecture and Port Engineering College, Shandong Jiaotong University, Weihai 264200, China
  • Lei Song Naval Architecture and Port Engineering College, Shandong Jiaotong University, Weihai 264200, China
  • Rongbiao Gong Naval Architecture and Port Engineering College, Shandong Jiaotong University, Weihai 264200, China
  • Haiduo Song American Bureau of Shipping (China) Limited., Dalian 116001, China
  • Weirui Li COSCO Shipping (Qidong) Offshore Co.,Ltd., Qidong 226200, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6919/ICJE.202608_12(8).0004

Keywords:

FPSO; AQWA; Motion Response Analysis.

Abstract

To investigate the motion response characteristics of a long-term moored floating production, storage and offloading unit (FPSO) under wave action, a Suezmax FPSO was selected as the research object. Based on three-dimensional linear potential-flow theory and wave radiation/diffraction theory, numerical simulations of the motion responses under wave loading were conducted using AQWA. The six-degree-of-freedom response amplitude operators (RAOs), first-order wave excitation forces, and time-domain motion response characteristics of the platform under different wave directions were systematically analysed. The effects of wave frequency and wave direction on the seakeeping performance of the FPSO were also discussed.The results show that the six-degree-of-freedom motion responses of the FPSO exhibit significant directional dependence. The RAO peaks are mainly concentrated in the low-frequency range, and the motion responses are significantly amplified when the wave frequency approaches the natural frequency of the platform. Moreover, the RAO peaks are not determined solely by the maximum value of any single type of excitation force, but result from the combined effects of the Froude–Krylov force, diffraction force, and other hydrodynamic forces. The time-domain analysis further verifies the frequency-domain results, indicating that the pitch and roll responses increase most significantly under severe sea conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Wu, J. M. (2012). Distinguishing feature and existing circumstances of FPSO. Ship Engineering, 34(S2). (In Chinese)

[2] Wang, S., Cao, Y., Fu, Q., et al. (2015). Hydrodynamic performance of a novel semi-submersible platform with nonsymmetrical pontoons. Ocean Engineering, 110, 106–115.

[3] Fang, S. X., Dou, P. L., Yuan, H. T., et al. (2025). Hydrodynamic analysis of cylindrical FPSOs based on different heave plates. Ship Science and Technology, 47(17). (In Chinese)

[4] Ji, L. S., Ji, C. Y., & Ji, L. H. (2017). Analysis of FPSO hydrodynamic performance in regular wave. China Offshore Platform, 32(5). (In Chinese)

[5] Ibinabo, I., & Tamunodukobipi, D. T. (2019). Determination of the response amplitude operator(s) of an FPSO. Engineering, 11(09), 541–556.

[6] Newman, J. N. (1977). Marine hydrodynamics. MIT Press.

[7] Faltinsen, O. M. (1990). Sea loads on ships and offshore structures. Cambridge University Press.

[8] Salvesen, N., Tuck, E. O., & Faltinsen, O. M. (1970). Ship motions and sea loads. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 78, 250–287.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Li, J., Song, L., Gong, R., Song, H., & Li, W. (2026). AQWA-Based Motion Response Analysis of a Suezmax FPSO. International Core Journal of Engineering, 12(8), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.6919/ICJE.202608_12(8).0004