Trajectory Optimization of Industrial Welding Robots based on Artificial Hummingbird Algorithm

Authors

  • Yundong Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6919/ICJE.202603_12(3).0031

Keywords:

Artificial Hummingbird Algorithm; Industrial Welding Robot; Trajectory Optimization; Multi-objective constraint; Chaos Mapping.

Abstract

In industrial welding scenarios, the smoothness of welding trajectories, uniformity of energy distribution, and control of thermal deformation directly determine weld quality and production efficiency. Traditional trajectory planning algorithms struggle to balance robustness, real-time performance, and executability under multi-objective constraints, exhibiting problems such as unstable convergence and a tendency to fall into local optima. This paper proposes the application of the Artificial Hummingbird Algorithm (AHA) and its improved variants to the trajectory optimization of industrial welding robots, constructing a multi-objective optimization framework to achieve closed-loop optimization of weld feature perception - trajectory generation - execution. By introducing chaos mapping in the population initialization phase, the global search capability and convergence stability of the algorithm are enhanced. A simulation model is built based on the Matlab platform, combining visual perception and robot kinematic models to model and optimize high-dimensional multi-objective constraints (smoothness, heat input, energy distribution, etc.). The research results show that the improved Artificial Hummingbird Algorithm can effectively enhance the smoothness of welding trajectories and the uniformity of energy distribution, reduce thermal deformation and residual stress, improve the consistency of weld quality and production efficiency, and provide an efficient and concise trajectory optimization scheme for industrial welding in complex environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Li, G.K., Liu, Y.M. (2022) Path planning of car body welding robots based on improved grasshopper optimization algorithm. Modular Machine Tool & Automatic Manufacturing Technique, (08): 31–34.

[2] Du, P. (2021) Integration and application of intelligent manufacturing and robot welding technology. Times Automobile, (15): 136–137.

[3] Gong, Z., Tu, F.Q., Li, S.W. (2022) Welding robot path planning based on improved wolf pack algorithm. Transducers and Microsystems, 41(12): 122–125.

[4] Hui, X.B., Guo, Q., Wu, P.P., et al. (2017) An improved wolf pack algorithm. Control and Decision, 32(7): 1164–1172.

[5] Wang, X., Shi, Y., Ding, D., et al. (2016) Double global optimum genetic algorithm-particle swarm optimization-based welding robot path planning. Engineering Optimization, 48(2): 299–316.

[6] Hu, J.J., Zou, D.X., Song, B., et al. (2025) Multi-strategy improved artificial hummingbird optimization algorithm and its application. Computer Era, (07): 41–46.

[7] Tian, G.F., Xiang, M., Lin, Z.L. (2024) Trajectory planning of sampling robots based on improved artificial hummingbird algorithm. Modular Machine Tool & Automatic Manufacturing Technique, (08): 17–21.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Li, Y. (2026). Trajectory Optimization of Industrial Welding Robots based on Artificial Hummingbird Algorithm. International Core Journal of Engineering, 12(3), 283-288. https://doi.org/10.6919/ICJE.202603_12(3).0031