Application of Predictive Control for Synchronous Motors in Oil Field Automation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6919/ICJE.202510_11(10).0008Keywords:
Oil Field Automation; Synchronous Motor; Triple-Vector MPCC; Speed Control.Abstract
For permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) systems exhibiting strong coupling, parameter uncertainties, and dynamic load disturbances, this paper proposes a Model-Free Adaptive Control with Multi-Vector Predictive Current Control (MFAC-MPCC) framework, integrating Compact Form Dynamic Linearization MFAC (CFDL-MFAC) for the speed loop and triple-vector model predictive current control (MPCC) for the current loop. The hybrid architecture decouples adaptive speed regulation from high-precision current tracking, achieving robust performance without reliance on motor parameters. Key advantages include: (1) Model-free operation via CFDL-MFAC, dynamically linearizing the speed loop using only I/O data; (2) Enhanced disturbance rejection through real-time adaptive tuning; (3) Superior current tracking via triple-vector MPCC, minimizing steady-state errors and harmonic distortions. Simulation comparisons with traditional PI control and CFDL-MFAC approach validate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed MFAC-MPCC scheme.
Downloads
References
[1] G. Eason, B. Noble, and I.N. Sneddon, “On certain integrals of Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel functions,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. A247, pp. 529-551, April 1955.
[2] Y. Xu, J. Wang, B. Zhang, and Q. Zhou, “Three-vector model predictive current control for permanent magnet synchronous motor,” Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 980–988, 2018 (in Chinese).
[3] M. Yang, X. Lang, J. Long, and D. Xu, “Flux immunity robust predictive current control with incremental model and extended state observer for PMSM drive,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 9267–9279, Dec. 2017.
[4] R. Chi, Y. Hui, S. Zhang, B. Huang, and Z. Hou, “Discrete-time extended state observer-based model-free adaptive control via local dynamic linearization,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 8691–8701, Oct. 2020.
[5] Y. Wang and Z. Hou, “Model-free adaptive predictive control for PMSM systems with external disturbances,” Control Theory & Applications, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 837–846, May. 2022 (in Chinese).
[6] Y. Xu, X. Ding, J. Wang, and Y. Li, “Three‐vector‐based low‐complexity model predictive current control with reduced steady‐state current error for permanent magnet synchronous motor,” IET Electric Power Appl, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 305–315, Feb. 2020.
[7] C. Treesatayapun, “Equivalent Piecewise Derivative Adaptive Control With Fuzzy Rules Emulated Network and Mitigation of Catastrophic Forgetting Learning,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern, Syst., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 758–767, Jan. 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Core Journal of Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




