Optimal Production Strategies in Closed-Loop Supply Chains under Carbon Policies and Diverse Recovery Modes

Authors

  • Wei Cui
  • Qiaolun Gu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6919/ICJE.202509_11(9).0005

Keywords:

Deposit-refund System; Closed-loop Supply Chain; Production Strategy; Remanufactured Products.

Abstract

Addressing manufacturers’ persistently low efficiency in collecting and reusing post-consumer returns, this study develops a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) model composed of one manufacturer and one recycler under a government-mandated deposit–refund scheme for new products. A take-back contract governing post-consumer returns recovery is explicitly embedded in the model, and numerical simulations are employed to examine how government policies and the manufacturer’s production strategies jointly affect the supply chain. The results show that, by leveraging this take-back contract with consumers and expanding the production scale of remanufactured goods, the manufacturer can significantly raise the remanufacturing yield from post-consumer returns. When both the carbon price per ton and the government deposit are relatively high, this strategy accelerates the deposit-refund cycle and increases the manufacturer’s total profit through enlarged scale effects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Liu Z, Li K W, Tang J, et al. Optimal operations of a closed-loop supply chain under a dual regulation. International Journal of Production Economics, 2021, 233: 107991.

[2] Huang C X, Li D F. Pricing and profit allocation in a closed-loop supply chain with deposit-refund recyclers based on a non-cooperative–cooperative biform game. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(2): 166–177.

[3] Li D F, Wei L X, Li M Q. A non-cooperative–cooperative biform game approach to dual-channel recycling competition and profit allocation in a closed-loop supply chain with deposit-refund manufacturers. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2023, 43(11): 3241–3264.

[4] Ma S J, Wang H M, Yang W H. Closed-loop supply chain network design based on a deposit-refund incentive system. Statistics & Decision, 2008(3): 68-70.

[5] Liu L, Li F T. Optimal decision-making and coordination of a dynamic recycling closed-loop supply chain considering incentive modes. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2020, 25(2): 125-133.

[6] Yu C H, Liu S S, Rong D L, et al. Coordination contract design for a two-stage dual-channel closed-loop supply chain considering remanufacturing collection rate. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 2018, 39(5): 756-760.

[7] Wang X T. Research on green R&D subsidy, cost-sharing and revenue-sharing contracts. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(6): 56-65.

[8] Yi Y Y, Yang X D. Design of waste product take-back contracts based on heterogeneous consumer groups. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2016, 30(4): 69-78.

[9] Xu B S, Liu S C, Shi P J, et al. Benefit analysis of automotive engine remanufacturing and its contribution to the circular economy [J]. China Surface Engineering, 2005(01): 1-7.

[10] Zhang X M, Li Q W, et al. Optimal pricing and remanufacturing mode in a closed-loop supply chain of WEEE under government fund policy. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2021, 151: 106951.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Cui, W., & Gu, Q. (2025). Optimal Production Strategies in Closed-Loop Supply Chains under Carbon Policies and Diverse Recovery Modes. International Core Journal of Engineering, 11(9), 34-41. https://doi.org/10.6919/ICJE.202509_11(9).0005